EBRAHIM MOOSA AND POSTMODERNISM: SOME CLOSE RESEMBLANCES AND IMPLICATIONS

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jun 28, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56389/tafhim.vol14no1.1
Keywords:
Ebrahim Moosa, postmodernism, Islam, dihlīz, essence

Main Article Content

Muhammad Yusra Ahmad Hulaimi
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Malaysia

Abstract

This article is aimed at cursory discussion on the structure of the thoughts of Ebrahim Moosa and its implications on the doctrinal aspects of Islam. More precisely, it studies Moosa’s interpretation of Islam. In exploring his thoughts, this article shall focus on some aspects of Moosa’s thoughts, notably: metaphysics, anthropology and exegesis, and conclude that Moosa’s ethos of interpretation and representation of Islam is, with some concern, postmodern. Also, it will conclude with some remarks on the de-essentialising implications of such a postmodern approach on the understanding of Islam’s essence. Lastly, his thoughts can be characteristically categorised as being (post) colonialistic in its insistence on interpreting Islam based not on its own worldview and vocabularies.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ahmad Hulaimi, M. Y. . (2021). EBRAHIM MOOSA AND POSTMODERNISM: SOME CLOSE RESEMBLANCES AND IMPLICATIONS. TAFHIM: IKIM Journal of Islam and the Contemporary World, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.56389/tafhim.vol14no1.1
Issue
Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021): Tafhim
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Açikgenç, Alparslan. Islamic Scientific Tradition in History. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit IKIM, 2017.

Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1995.

_____. Comments on the Re-Examination of al-Rānīrī’s Hujjat al-Siddiq: A Refutation. Kuala Lumpur: Muzium Negara, 1975.

_____. Islam and Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1993. Duderija, Adis. The Imperatives of Progressive Islam. New York: Routledge Publishing, 2017.

al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid. Mishkāt al-Anwār [The Niche of Lights: A Parallel English-Arabic Text]. Trans. David Buchman. Utah: Brigham Young University Press, 1998.

Griffel, Frank. Al-Ghazali’s Philosophical Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Hallaq, Wael B. Restating Orientalism : A Critique of Modern Knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press, 2018.

_____. Sharīʿa: Theory, Practice, Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

_____. The Impossible State: Islam, Politics, and Modernity’s Moral Predicament. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013.

Harvey, Michael. “Wittgenstein’s Notion of Theology as Grammar.” Religious Studies 25 , no. 1 (1989): 89–103.

Izutsu, Toshihiko. God and Man in the Quran. 2nd Ed. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust, 2008.

Kakoliris, Gerasimos. “Jacques Derrida’s Deconstruction of Western Metaphysics: The Early Years no. 4.” Dia-noesis: A Journal of Philosophy 4 (2017): 43-62. https://1drv.ms/b/s!AoLCD3Gv8Q3WhUtz175qyUr3lT4f.

Kelly, Mark. “Foucault, Subjectivity, and Technologies.” In A Companion to Foucault. Ed. Christopher Falzon, Jana Sawi and Timothy O’Leary. 1st ed. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2013.

Key, Alexander. Language Between God and the Poets: Maʿnā in the Eleventh Century. California: University of California Press, 2018.

Lawlor, Leonard, and Zeynep Direk. A Companion to Derrida. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.

Moore, A. W. The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics: Making Sense of Things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Moosa, Ebrahim. “Allegory of the Rule (Ḥukm): Law as Simulacrum in Islam?” History of Religions 38 (1): 1–24. www.jstor.org/stable/3176517.

_____. Ghazali and the Poetics of Imagination. North Carolina: The University of North Carolina Press, 2005.

_____. “On Reading Shāṭibī in Rabat and Tunis.” The Muslim World 104 (4): 451–464. doi:10.1111/muwo.12072.

_____. “Textuality in the Muslim Imagination: from Authority to Metaphoricity.” Acta Academica Supplementum (1995): 54–65.

_____. “The Sufahā’ in Qur’ān Literature: A Problem In Semiosis.” Der Islam (1998): 1–27.

_____. “The Unbearable Intimacy of Language and Thought in Islam.” In How Should We Talk About Religion? : Perspectives, Contexts, Particularities. Ed. James Boyd White. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2006.

Postman, Neil. Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Vintage Books, 1993.

Seymour, Laura. An Analysis of Roland Barthes’s The Death of the Author. London: Macat International Limited, 2018.

Todd, Richard. The Ṣūfī Doctrine of Man: Ṣadr al-Dīn al-Qūnawī’s Metaphysical Anthropology. Boston: Brill Publishers, 2014.