Quantum Physics and the Boundaries of Human Perception

Ahmed Mabrouk, Skilik Robo Advisory


Abstract


The experimental results of quantum physics were manipulated by empiricists to forward some philosophical notions, which are in conflict with common sense and religious convictions. Most seriously, the notion of observer-created reality questions the independent reality of subatomic particles and endows divine qualities on observers who presumably determine their status. Moreover, the seemingly spontaneous electronic transitions were used to shed light as to whether the universe has a stationary configuration. In this article, both notions are analysed in terms of the logical consistency of their arguments and the scientific approach they adopt. The same arguments are also examined in light of the Islamic conceptual framework pertinent to how the universe is like. The article starts by delineating the logical framework of classical physics through discussing three energyrelated concepts. A more objective approach that emerges from the positions of rationalists, such as Faraday and Einstein, is proposed. It is argued that despite the peculiarities of quantum physics, drawing parallels between classical and quantum physics is possible, and following the same analytical approach in both is imperative.

Keywords


quantum physics, conservation of energy, observercreated reality, double-slit experiment, randomness, Copenhagen interpretation, uncertainty principle, empiricism, limits of human knowledge

Full Text:

PDF

References


Born, Max. Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1965.

Cohen, I., ed. Isaac Newton’s Papers and Letters on Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978.

Cushing, James. Philosophical Concepts in Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Feynman, Richard, et al. The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1963.

Heitler, Walter. “The Departure from Classical Thought in Modern Physics.” In Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. Ed. Paul Schilpp. London: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

Hewitt, Paul. Conceptual Physics. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1987.

Holton, Gerald, and Stephen Brush. Physics, the Human Adventure. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2006.

Ibn ʿĀshūr, Muḥammad Al-Ṭāhir. Al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Vol. 22. Tunis: al-Dār al-Tūnisiyah li al-Nashr, 1984.

Jardine, Lisa. Francis Bacon Discovery and the Art of Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.

Lange, Marc. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Physics. Cornwall: Blackwell Publishing, 2002.

Lightman, Alan. Great Ideas in Physics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000.

Murdoch, Dugald. Niels Bohr’s Philosophy of Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Al-Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn. Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb. Vol. 5. Beirut: Dāral-Fikr, 2005.

Rosenblum, Bruce, and Fred Kuttner. Quantum Enigma. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Serway, Raymond, and John Jewett. Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2014.

Titān, ʿAbd al-Karīm, and Muḥammad al-Kīlānī. ʿAwn alMurīd li Sharḥ Jawharat al-Tawḥīd. Vol. 1. Damascus: Dāral-Bashāʾir, 1999.

Wheeler, John and Wojciech Hubert Zurek, eds. Quantum Theory and Measurement. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1983.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.